Monday, September 26, 2005

Protocols of The Elders of Zion, Responsibility of 9/11 incident and fianlly Does the State of Israel have the right to exist?

Peace be on all you people out there. This is a comment in response to Mr. Elstevo, a commentator or Flanstein's Blog. The comments are about the Post Islam – evil on a stick.
Please feel free to check out the post and the post before it titled The mind of a Moslem, whatever that meant!!!!!

(http://flanstein.blogspot.com/ - Post titled Islam – evil on a stick and also connected to the post "The mind of a Moslem")
Elstevo said
Since you never actually anwsered ANY of Flanstein's claims, let ME ask three simple questions:
Dalulla said
I do not think you read my comments thoroughly because I did answer and had questions myself that none were answered to, not by Flanstein nor anyone else.

Elstevo said
What do you think of The Protocols of The Elders of Zion?
Dalulla said
These protocols are not something that the Arabs or Moslems invented, as a matter of fact were invented or discovered by the Europeans.
Kindly read, this is something I copied out for you from a site off the net. Reference: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mzionprotocol.html
(I do not fully agree to it but will explain later).

"The Protocols are the classic statement of the old notion of an international Jewish conspiracy. They purport to be the text of discussions showing how Jews planned to take over the world and enslave non-Jews. They've long been an excuse to persecute Jews and have been promoted by many famous and powerful people, including some in the U.S.

In 1920, Henry Ford started a newspaper for the purpose of attacking Jews and communists. His paper, the Dearborn Independent, "printed every conceivable staple of contemporary anti-Semitism, including the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" (A Legacy of Hate: Anti-Semitism in America, by Ernest Volkman, p. 33).

A U.S. Congressman, Hamilton Fish of New York, once used his office to distribute copies of the Protocols. Accused of anti-Semitism, he responded, "It doesn't bother me any. There's been too much Jewism going around anyway." He was defeated in his 1944 re-election bid (A Legacy of Hate, p. 42).

Where did the Protocols come from? Binjamin Segel's book (translated and edited by Richard S. Levy), A Lie and a Libel: The History of the ''Protocols of the Elders of Zion'' begins with a likely timeline. According to Segel, the Protocols were most likely fabricated in Paris between 1897 and 1899 under the supervision of the head of the Russian secret police abroad, Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky. The intent was "to strengthen the czar Nicholas II's position by exposing his opponents as allies with those who were part of a massive conspiracy to take over the world" (Skeptic's Dictionary, http://skepdic.com/protocols.html.)

The first known publication of the Protocols was August 26-September 3, 1903, when they appeared in abbreviated form in the Russian language paper Znamia ("The Banner"). In 1905, Sergei Nilus published the "full" version as an appendix to his book Velikoe v Malom ("The Great in the Small"). In 1906, another version was published by G. Butmi in his book Vragi Roda Chelovecheskago ("Enemies of the Human Race").

In 1917, Nilus, who had already published the Protocols two more times, produced yet another edition, this time attributing them to Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern political Zionism, i.e., Jewish nationalism.

In 1919, anti-communist Russians distributed copies of the Protocols to members of the U.S. cabinet, judiciary, and intelligence agencies. Henry Ford's edition appeared in 1920, as I said, and the document received attention in the British press as well. Thirty-three editions are known to have appeared by 1933.

In 1921, a reporter for the Times of London, Philip Graves, found that the Protocols had been plagiarized. As it turned out, there were two sources: Dialogue between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in Hell, an 1864 satire of the French ruler Napoleon III by Parisian lawyer Maurice Joly, and Biarritz, an 1868 novel by German anti-Semite Hermann Goedsche.

Goedsche is credited with developing the whole “Jewish plan of world conquest” idea. Biarritz features a chapter, “In the Jewish Cemetery of Prague,” in which the princes of the twelve tribes of Israel gather at the cemetery to report the progress of their world takeover schemes. As Segel said in A Lie and a Libel, “The plot bore such a striking resemblance to the one developed in the Protocols that any reasonable person must conclude that either both were written by the same man or one was plagiarized from the other” (emphasis in original).
Segel continues: “Thus the world-conquering plans of the Elders of Zion came out of Goedsche’s trashy novel. But the Elders’ political dogmas and schemes, as well as the moral principles that were their foundation, came almost word for word from the speeches of Machiavelli in Joly’s petty satire on Napoleon III.”

Graves debunked the Protocols in the Times, the first in a long series of refutations. Among others, a South African court ruled them a forgery and a Swiss court declared them a fraud.
Faced with the facts, some early promoters of the Protocols repented. Henry Ford published the Protocols along with his other anti-Semitic articles in a book entitled The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem. But in 1927, he publicly retracted and apologized for the book, claiming his assistants had duped him.

But Ford was the exception. Others continued to publish the Protocols in other countries long after they'd been debunked.

A few even managed to explain away the evidence of plagiarism. Segel relates that Lord Alfred Douglas, an anti-Semitic leader in London, said that Joly was actually a Jew originally named Moses Joel, who interwove the real Jewish plan for world conquest into his satire. This meant that showing the Protocols were extremely similar to his satire proved nothing--of course they were, because they both were talking about the same real event!

The truth is, the Protocols were a useful weapon against the Jews, and those who propagated them in all likelihood didn't care if they were true or not. In 1933, excerpts were read at the Romanian parliament by Fascists as a reason to expel Jews from the country. Hitler cited them in Mein Kampf and again when castigating the Jews as warmongers in 1939. Franco cited the Protocols in his denunciations of the Jews as well.

You'd think the Protocols might have been put to rest after World War II and the Holocaust, but no. Communists in the Soviet Union used the Protocols to stir up anti-Jewish sentiment, and they continued to be circulated around the world. Segel's timeline continues all the way up to 1994 (his book was published in 1995), when an Australian edition was produced by Christian fundamentalists.
Dalulla said
I would like to bring up something. The definition of "a rumor".
Rumor: an assertion or set of assertions widely repeated though its truth is unconfirmed by facts or evidence.

"A rumor goes in one ear and out many mouths," reads an ancient Chinese proverb. In the original Latin, "rumor" was a synonym for "noise." Rumors, gossip and hearsay have long been regarded — and derided — as forms of idle, destructive chatter.

Though unreliable by their very nature, rumors can prove to be true, however. "Rumor is not always wrong," noted Tacitus, the Roman historian. The crux of the matter isn't truth value per se, but the absence of verification.

All this fuss about the Protocols of Elder Zion may have a truth in it. But there is part which I do know is fact.
Please note the following:

Where I am concerned, Yes I do believe there is a very careful conspiracy from the (please mark my words) "Zionists" to claim the land from the Nile to the Euphrates as theirs, I don’t know if their dreams went as far as claiming the world, but this I do know and have seen it on their local televisions! First hand, not second hand news! They teach the children in school "Dawlet Israel men el Nil lel Furat – the state of Israel is from the Nile to the Euphrates – ").

And moreover the Zionists' attitudes in many aspects where hatred towards the middle east. There are efforts to veil this slow crawling through their never ending efforts to make agreements with neighboring countries. It is too obvious. It's just so funny. The stupidest thing to do is to underestimate people's intelligence. To think some one is stupid or dumb is the first big mistake anyone can make. Never underestimate a person's mentality, no matter how dumb or stupid "you may choose to think" they are!

Why have they come to Egypt in efforts of conquering our land? They managed to conquer Sinai but only for a while. Again too bad, were pushed out, and yet are still most welcomed in it to visit and stay as long as they wish to, and get first class treatment as well!
You should see Sharm El Sheikh during Jewish national holidays and holy events! It is packed with Jews and people from Israel. I personally made some friends there too. Only the ones I made friends with were peace loving people. They just want to live and let others live without bothering anyone and were not for the existence of the Israeli state. A State established on the blood of the original owners of the land!

Why else would they have secretly allied with the United States Forces in the War on Iraq. It is known to every one they were taking part in it! But too bad, they came out empty handed so far or maybe not so empty handed, but with more disrespect along with any other country that did not admit that this aggression was unfair.

Off topic from your question, but I would like to add, In the United States and in England there are still marches demanding that the troops from both countries be brought back safe home (that was on your local News just yesterday!!!). Why in God's name won't you see the truth? Why can't you admit that the soldiers on these frontiers are being tortured in a war that is not theirs to fight? Why can't you feel the anguish of all your fellow American's families who are sleepless worrying about a close kin? What's in it for you? Maybe because none of your own relatives is in this you cannot feel it, but for me as a Moslem, I feel the pain of each mother worried sick for her son out there, I feel for the fathers, the sisters and the sons and daughters. I feel for them all. And I also feel for the Iraqis in anguish. Don't you see? There is anguish on both sides!

Elstevo said
Who was responsible for 9/11?

Dalulla said
The oppression and injustice of the Foreign Policies of the United States Government against the middle East is responsible.
And by saying so I AM NOT justifying the act, because under no circumstance shall I by any means defend it. But I must admit, it was a result of pressure that was not and still is not being properly contained by the Foreign Policies. And till the United States Government minds its own business or show respect and justice towards the Middle East, the nightmare will continue to recur.

It is something no one desires believe me. What's in bloodshed and insecurity for any one? Can you tell me? What good would the mass murders serve Us Moslems or any one else? By logic it will become an ongoing circle of violence which is the case now. The war on terrorism is doing nothing but increasing it, but not just in our part of the world, but in many other countries that are needless of this agony!

Trust me this will not change as long as the attitude towards the Middle East changes. Some people just got fed up with the arrogant and interfering attitude of the Foreign Policies of United States government. When Bill Clinton was President there was no violence to these extremes, Actually nothing in comparison to what has been happening and still is. If you open your eyes just a bit and walk out of this nutshell you insist to stay in, you will realize that violence increased when Mr. Bush came in Presidency.

Look at his face, how he has aged drastically during this short period of time. I believe it is the result of the extreme stress he's brought onto himself. Never have we heard of tampering with Polls during a presidency election as the whole world witnessed during this last election, never have we heard and seen a percentage so big amongst the United States citizens not wanting a president the way it happened during this last election. Come on please try to be a bit rational, set aside this one track mindedness and open your eyes to see the facts that the whole world witnessed. Not just the Arab Moslems and non Arab Moslems but also many Christians and Jews as well!

Elstevo said
Does Israel have a right to exist?
Dalulla said
Yes, of course it does. But DEFINITELY not on the account of any other nation. Not by demolitions, not by threatening people and bullying them out of their "homelands", not by taking away the air they breathe, and not by believing that Jewish blood is more valuable than any other Human beings' is. Because for fact it is no better.
WE are all human and what makes us different is how we act towards one another. Anyone who is respectable will definitely earn Respect.

P.S. Kindly check out my post titled Netuerei Karta International (Jews United Against Zionism). I do not hate Jews, but I despise Zionists in all senses LOUD AND CLEAR WITH ALL MY HEART!!!

9 Comments:

Blogger The Infidel Army said...

Wow! Now Israel has the power to take the air that people breathe. What ever will they think of next?


Let the Global Anti-Jihad begin!

8:50 AM, September 26, 2005  
Blogger The Sandmonkey said...

You don't want my comment on this post!

3:17 PM, September 26, 2005  
Blogger Dalulla said...

Sandmonkey
Why would i not want your comments sandmonkey? And if you think so why write this comment in the first place?

the infidel army,
Very interesting name you got there

11:49 PM, September 26, 2005  
Blogger أبو سنان said...

Flanstein is a nutter. I wont visit his site even though he posts his hate at my site.

3:13 PM, September 27, 2005  
Blogger Dalulla said...

Abu sinan,

Well it seems this hate thing is known about the guy. But don't you agree that it is a real pity that a person wastes valuable time that is irrevocable in hate?

Not just him, but any one for all I care. We all sometimes get that feeling, but i believe those of us who are strong are the ones who try to overcome it. Hate is something awful and hearts that carry it i believe are in burden.

Scientific researches revealed that tension results in the release of toxins in the entire body which affect the life span of the internal organs! Hate is one of the worst forms of negative tension I believe and we live only once!

:-) Glad to have you here Abu Sinan.

2:15 AM, September 28, 2005  
Blogger أبو سنان said...

Thanks, nice to be here. Good blog. Hate will kill you, literally. It doesnt matter what kind, anti-Muslim, anti-western, it all is a killer. Time for some peace, quiet, and much less hate.

2:44 AM, September 29, 2005  
Blogger Dalulla said...

Hello Steve,

Thank you, (some how off topic, but not completely though) I do try to post things that may be useful to us all, most of all, I really wish I can get one thing through to all people and that is "lets side aside our differences and try to live together in peace" which I know is not an easy task. But I cannot give it up even though I know it is not easy. I believe we should all try to spread good feelings amongst us.

Can you please elaborate on why you do not "personally" believe Israel should have the right to exist? And what did you mean by no state really has the "right" to exist.

Where the last bit is concerned, I "personally" sometimes wish I had the power to remove all boundaries between countries. That this earth may be open to all, abiding to one universal law.

If the Palestinians had accepted the raw deal which you mentioned, they would have simply been saying yes we do accept the current status and we are willing to give away "willingly because we have no other choice" a bit of our land!

Their decision was right I believe, even though as you mentioned Israel went ahead and conquered what was left. But to say No in dignity and fight for their rightful land and die in the process or be tortured (which is the case) is more honorable than accepting what was offered.

What do you suppose keeps those people going and tolerating all this anguish and pain?

I was watching television tonight with my son and Pocahontas (I hope I spelled that righ, lol) was on and what was funny was that the scene I came across was quite interesting and reminded me of the Palestinians.

She decided to go to king James and face him with the facts. He asked her aren't you afraid for your life amongst all those in disagreement with you? In dignity and strength of will, she said NO because I speak the TRUTH. My people will fight till the end, and people will die from your end, but why? (not word for word of course, but that was the main idea). She also mentioned one of his supposed trusted men had been telling him lies and asked him to listen to his inner voice only for once.

I just feel sick at the idea, of this world negativity about this Israel/Palestine issue. It is so clear that the Israeli's took what is not theirs, and yet no one said anything. I wonder why??? Steve, do you have an opinion on this last bit where the world silence is concerned? If yes, please jot it down if you don't mind. I would appreciate it.

The Israeli system creates an illusion, lives it, and believes it at the end of the day to be a reality! I do not understand what kind of sense those people have? What and how are they thinking? And do they think this is going to last? Do you know that in one of the interviews of David Weiss, a Rabi amongst the establishers of the Neutri Karta organization said in an interview that Israel is a Nation Against the will of God, and when asked what his opinion was about the Rabbis in Israel who say otherwise, he replied without hesitation saying that they are in conspiracy with the Israeli government. All the Rabbis in that organization say so out loud. Check out the site, it's on one of my posts in the archives.

I personally met Jews from different countries around the world in Sinai, and most of them are happy where they are. They will not go to the so called state of Israel because they will not build their lives on the lives of others.

Honestly Steve, the protocols are in the knowledge of the knowledge keeper (God I mean from my perspective). But most of us Arabs are aware of the fact they do say openly that Israel is a State that is from the Nile to the Euphrates. So many indications from history do proof they are dreaming of it. To begin with and up to my knowledge, their attempt to conquer and keep Sinai. And maybe this has not been brought up publicly, but there was Israeli presence and maybe still is in the war on Iraq, known through bits and pieces of information from news sources. They do may have some control over American and European Media, but they do not have over many other Arab miscellaneous types of media.

Steve there has been much held back from the Americans and Europeans about many events here in the Middle East. Many of the Residents in Egypt from different parts of America, Canada, and Europe have even mentioned that. The none Arab Media had managed to for some reason always been sympathetic with the Israeli side, not really revealing much of the truth that has been going on with our side. These things only changed after the incident of 9/11 attacks for some reason or the other. I was watching closely, CNN, BBC, Euro News, and Al Jazeera and other sources of Middle East media. I realized that they were all almost showing pretty much the same information with some reservations though from the none Arab side still remained.

5:24 AM, September 29, 2005  
Blogger Dalulla said...

Abu Sinan,
By the way, your son is masha'Allah adorable! Allah ye7meeh we yebarek fi we yej3alo min al sale7een insha'Allah.

Thank you about what you mentioned regarding my blog. I am trying
:-) Trying to make a difference in spreading good feelings amongs us and in efforts of reminding myself as well.

I totally agree with you about your statement about hate. hatred towards anyone is useless. But for it to end everyone must begin with themselves, make efforts to be fair to others, to rid oneself of greed and arrogance. I do agree enough of the wars and hatreds going on. We need peace desperatley ... all of us. This alone is a very complicated issue and i believe the segregation of God given laws and politics led to this ongoing dillema.

I am not for segregation of Religion from Politics in the sense that i dislike man made laws that are not in correlation and acceptance with the God given ones. Long topic... and very complicated with all the diversities and stubborn minds around.

5:30 AM, September 29, 2005  
Blogger Mohammed said...

Nice post Dalulla. I would like to say something about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. As all zionists and other people call it a forgery and fake document,no one can deny that this document writtent over a 100 years ago contains "ideas" and "plans" that are still coming true! I am not saying that this document is true but i am also not saying it is fake because it is too detailed and too specific to current and past events (WW I, WW II, creation of Israel, League of nations/UN, IMF, 1929 stock market crash, and i can go on with the list..) to ignore it! Even for a minute if we assume that it is a fake, then what kind of a person was this forgerer? This person would have to be a prophet 100 times better than Nostrudamus or some sort of a mystic or magician to be able to predict so many things in 1901 which are still coming true! The protocols are just too powerful to brush aside as Nazi propaganda and a fake document.

Peace to all
Moahammed

5:26 AM, October 13, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home